X´CACEL: PROPOSAL FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF A PROTECTED AREA

Benito Prezas Hernández, Roberto Herrera, Julio C. Zurita.
El Colegio de la Frontera Sur.Unidad-Chetumal . A.P. 424. Chetumal, Quintana Roo, Mexico, 77000,
tel.:983-21666, fax 983-20447, email: zurita@xaway.ciqro.conacyt.mx
(Presented at the 18th International Symposium on Sea Turtle Biology and Conservation, Mazatlán, Mexico, 3 - 7 March, 1998)

ABSTRACT

X´cacel is located 112 km south of Cancun, Quintana Roo, Mexico and has an total area of 311 hectares; of which 156 hectares is terrestrialenvironment and 155 hectares of aquatic environment. This area includes, X´cacel beach, one of most important nesting beaches for loggerhead, Caretta caretta , and green sea turtles, Chelonia mydas, in Mexico. This studies’ purpose was to support and realize the proposal made by the Grupo Ecologista del Mayab (GEMA) in 1994 to declare X´cacel a protected natural area and establish the management strategy most appropriate for the site. In 1995 maps were used to determine the different types of vegetation and a detailed list of species most representative of the fauna and flora was created, using bibliographic review, direct observation and interview. We analyzed the impact of tourism on the area and evaluated an alternative, the increase of financial resources with tourism further controlled, the benefits of which would be the maintenance of the area, support of protection, research, conservation and environmental education activities. We propose that the area be considered a Managed Natural Reserve, according to the Union International for the Conservation of Nature (UICN), and protected area for wild fauna and flora with respect to Sistema Nacional de Areas Protegidas (SINAP).

INTRODUCTION

The state of Quintana Roo, has 14 areas legally protected, by state or federal official decree. Two belong to the continental zone and l2 to the coastal zone, in which are found important sea turtles nesting sites. Yum-balam, Isla Contoy and Sian Kaán Biosphere reserve are hawksbill Eretmochelys imbricata, nesting sites. Green Chelonia mydas and loggerhead Caretta caretta nest at these sites and also on the eastern part of Isla Cozumel and Tulum National Park. The studies made by Zurita et al. (1993) determined that the beaches with the greatest density of  turtle nests are: Chemuyil, X'cacel and Aventuras DIF; in addition they recommended legal actions to be taken for their integral protection due to their biological characteristics, their biogeographic importance and their state of conservation, and the threat that prevails within the tourist corridor Cancún - Tulum.

The present state of the beach is fairly stable, despite the pressures of tourist development. The principle beaches of the area are owned by Fideicomiso Caleta de Xel-ha y del Caribe (FIDECARIBE), which was created to advance tourist development. X’cacel was owned by the federal government from 1972 to 1992, since 1993 it has been in the hands of the state.

In 1994 the Ecological group of the Mayab (GEMA) officially proposed incorporating  X'cacel into the National System of Protected Areas (SINAP). The proposal includes the diagnosis asked for by the federal authorities, including the physical, biological, historical, cultural, investigation, legislation and socioeconomic aspects of the proposed area. The National Institute of Ecology has not answered GEMA’s request. At the moment, the importance of  X´cacel’s beach is considered in the Management Plan of the tourist corridor Cancún - Tulum since it is in a zone of ecological protection (Gob. Est. 1994). The same document indicates that the FIDECARIBE lands are subject to low density tourism developments, with up to 10 rooms per hectare. FIDECARIBE controls  1,800 hectares from Akumal to Xel-ha including the main nesting beaches of  the marine turtles. In 1996 Prezas updated this proposal  and established the category of appropriate handling.

The purpose of the present work is to provide a general panorama of the proposal to consider X´cacel as a protected area.

AREA

X´cacel is located along the eastern coast of the state of Quintana Roo, 112 km south of Cancún by  way of the Puerto Juárez - Chetumal highway, in the tourist corridor Cancún - Tulum. Xcacel is in the municipality of Solidarity. In the north it borders Chemuyil, in  the south  Xel-Ha, in the east the Caribbean Sea and in the west federal highway 307. The total area is 311 hectares, of which 156 are in the terrestrial environment and 155  in the aquatic.

RESEARCH REVIEW

The relevant  aspects of flora and fauna of the area are mentioned in the studies by GEMA (1994) and Prezas (1996). The aquatic habitat  is represented by two cenotes and coral reefs. In the terrestrial area, it displays a disturbed zone, occuping extension of 2 hectares and represents 1.3 % of the total  area; 15% corresponds to the secondary vegetation represented by an abandoned coconut plantation (Cocos nucifera),  83.7% of the area is made up of native vegetation in a good state of conservation in which subcaducifolia predominates the low forest. In the terrestrial habitat 137 plant species, 20 mammals, 11 amphibians, 24 reptiles and 44 birds were registered; in the aquatic habitat 23 species of algae, 23 corals and 109 fishes were registered.

Some of the species observed at X´cacel are considered under some kind of protection, either by the Mexican laws (Gob. Fed.1994) or by international norms (IUCN, 1988; IUCN, 1989). For the species of  plants: the palm kuka Pseudophoenix sargentii, Chit Thrinax radiata, Hoo´loop Bravaisia tubiflora, subi'n Acacia dolichostach and mangrove (Rhizofora mangle, Avicennia germinans, Laguncularia racemosa and Conocarpus erecta). Within the species of fauna: the marsh crocodile Crocodylus moreleti, the boa Boa constrictor, the marsh turtle Kinosternon creaseri, Rhinoclemmys areolata, and the loggerhead and green sea turtles.

Along the entire coast of  Quintana Roo, Zurita et al. (1993) registered 1,331 to 2,166 loggerhead turtle nests and 481 to 2,296 green turtle nests, of these 60% of the loggerhead and 45% of the green  turtle nests were found on the beaches in the central part of the state. In the sea turtle tagging program in the central part of Quintana Roo, Zurita et al. (1994, 1997) indicated that an average of 269 loggerhead  and 120 green turtles were tagged . Preliminary data of the maximum efficiency intercepting nesting turtles on the main beaches is 75% for loggerheads and 89% for green turtles during the period of 1987 to 1995. Márquez (1976) estimated  500 nesting loggerhead turtles and,  283 to 420 green turtles nesting in Quintana Roo (Ogren, 1989).

The relevance of conserving the main areas of these nesting colonies of loggerhead and green turtles, is based on: a) more than 10 years of investigation and conservation  of these main nesting areas by the defunct Centro de Investigaciones de Quintana Roo, b) the investigations made by Dr. Brian Bowen and his team from the University of Florida, who indicate that a substantial portion of the diversity of mtDNA found among green turtles in the Atlantic resides in this population, and similar arguments can be made about the loggerhead turtles of this area, c) eight years of environmental education activities have been carried out at this beach, d) and finally X’ cacel’s present state of conservation.

Considering the ecological importance of the area  X’cacel and the threat of tourist development the situation should be reviewed. The representatives of the three levels of government (Federal, State and Municipal),  research centers, scientists with ecological knowledge and natural resource management experience, conservation groups, and the representatives from civil and private associations signed the document: Management Plan of the Tourist Corridor Cancun - Tulum (Gob. Fed. 1994). This document indicates the following :
"In the case of the realization of development projects or exploitation in the zone of X´cacel the following risks to the integrity of the ecosystem and the species in danger of ,extinction that live there, such as marine turtles who depend on these beaches for their reproduction: a) erosion of dunes b) disturbance of the vegetation that controls the flow of water c) contamination and alterations of the physical, chemical and biological characteristics of the beaches d)  disturbance of nesting female turtles and their nests e) disturbance caused by the artificial illumination of the beach and adjacent areas f) disturbance caused by noises generated by aquatic activities and g) disturbances in the reef and its platform, potentially able to alter the water flow. The viability study concludes that in the strip between the 60 m isobath and the Federal Highway Chetumal - Puerto Jua'rez, there should not exist any type of development. It is necessary to closely evaluate the proposal to include this coastal strip and its associated forest in the National System of Protected Areas. Finally, it is asked that in case the area is subject to sale, that conservationists groups who have promoted the protection of the area and sea turtles are given the right of first
refusal".

The UNEP/ACOPS report (1995) recommends permanent monitoring of the signed agreements, since there is a probability that this area will be sold for unsustainable tourist development which would cause ecological damage and is contrary to the above mentioned agreement.

Prezas (1996) analyzed the incidence of  tourism in the area and evaluated alternatives such as a source of financing with controlled or low impact tourism, whose benefits would be utilized for the operation of the area and to support the activities of protection, investigation, conservation and environmental education. Following a simplified scheme to evaluate the suitable category of management for the protected area proposal by Mackinnon et al. (1990) and according  to the natural values and suitable handling of the area.  Prezas (1996) concludes that it should be considered as a Managed Natural Reserve, according to the proposed categorization by International Union Conservation Nature (IUCN), and that with respect to the National System of Protected Areas (SINAP), it can be considered  an area of protection of flora and wild fauna. GEMA (1994) proposes the creation of a local administration to manage X´cacel which would keep accounts available for public inspection and possibly  giving greater stability  to the project.

All the legal mechanisms that have been realized  to protect the area are based within the structure of the Mexican Inter-ministerial Commission for Marine Turtle Protection and Conservation created in 1993, through the establishment of the National Committee for the Protection and Conservation of Marine Turtles (Gob.Fed. 1993). This system of organization is reflected in the activities of the different institutions (SEMARNAP, INP, PRONATURA, Committee of Protection in Isla Cozumel, Ecological Group of Akumal, Amigos de  Sian Ka ´an, Xcaret and others) to protect the marine turtles in Quintana Roo (Isla Holbox, Isla Contoy, Cancun, Reserve of the Biosphere of Sian Ka´an,  Xcaret Eco.archeological Park, Akumal, X´cacel and 10 beaches along the central coast, Mahahual and adjacent beaches) with the purpose of stabilizing  these nesting colonies. Nevertheless, the sale of X´cacel was announced in February of 1998 by the state government of Quintana Roo for the development of a "Eco- tourist" project;  similar to the ones on Aventuras-DIF and Chemuyil beaches in 1997.  At the time of this writing the sale is pending.

CONCLUSIONS

There is increasing pressure to develop this area. All or part of the three of the critical beaches (Chemuyil, Aventuras-DIF and X’cacel) have recently been sold.  If the state and federal authorities do not include the area of X´cacel in SINAP, then this risks the losing of one of the most important nesting sites for the green and loggerhead turtles. The recovery of these nesting colonies would be affected; therefore, it will be left in doubt the credibility of the actions made  by the Mexican Inter-ministerial Commission for Marine Turtle Protection and Conservation. A substantial portion of the mtDNA diversity in Atlantic green turtles resides in this one nesting population, and similar arguments can be made for the loggerhead species. Consider the effects of the construction of tourist infrastructure in the nesting areas of Chemuyil and Aventuras DIF.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Therefore, we recommended an overhaul of the environmental impact studies and a permanent monitoring of development in these areas. That this area, X'cacel, vital to sea turtle reproduction be protected in a meaningful way.

LITERATURE CITED

  • GEMA, 1994. Propuesta para incorporar Playa X´cacel al sistema nacional de áreas protegidas como reserva ecológica. Grupo Ecologista del Mayab, Cancún, Q. Roo, 50 pp.
  • IUCN, 1988. Rare and threatened palms of the new world. Botanic Gardens Conservation Secretariat. 44 pp.
  • IUCN, 1988. Red list of threatened animals. The IUCN Conservation Monitoring Center. Cambridge. 154 pp.
  • IUCN, 1989. Rare and threatened palms of Central America Botanic Gardens Conservation Secretariat. 44 pp.
  • Gobierno Federal. 1993. Acuerdo por el que se crea el Comite Nacional para la Protección y Conservación de Tortugas Marinas. Diario Oficial de la Federación. México. 2 de diciembre de 1993
  • Gobierno Fedederal. 1994. NOM-059-Ecol-1994. Norma Oficial Mexicana-059. Tomo CDLXXXVIII No. 10, 16 de mayo de 1994, Diario Oficial de la Federación. México D.F., 60 pp.
  • Gobierno Estatal. 1994. Acuerdo de coordinación para el ordenamiento ecológico de la región denominada corredor Cancún-Tulum, Periódico Oficial Gob. Q. Roo., 9 de junio de 1994. 10(7):1-30 p.
  • Márquez, R.M. 1976. Reservas naturales para la conservación de las tortugas marinas de México. Ser. Inform.,  I.N.P./S.I. 83: 1 - 22.
  • Mackinnon, J., K. Mackinnon, G. Child y J. Thorsell, 1990. Manejo de Areas Protegidas en los Tropicos. UICN y PNUMA, trad. Biocenosis, México. 314 pp.
  • Prezas, B. H. 1996. X´cacel: Propuesta para el establecimiento y manejo de una área protegida. Tes.Maestría, El Colegio de la Frontera Sur. Chetumal, Q Roo. 90pp.
  • UNEP/ACOPS, 1995.  Mexico City recommendations on Sustainable Development of Tourism in the Wider Caribbean. Mexico City, 18-20 April 1995. 275 pp .
  • Ogren, L. 1989. Status Report of the Green Turtle. Proc. 2nd Western Atlant. Symp. U.S. Dep. Comm.,  NOAA, NMFS. Panama City, 89 - 94 p.
  • Zurita, J. C., R. Herrera y B. Prezas, 1993.  Tortugas marinas del Caribe.pp 735-751 In: Biodiverdidad Marina y Costera de México. Salazar-Vallejo,S.I y N.E. González (eds.). Com. Nal.   Biodiversidad  y CIQRO,  México, 865
  • Zurita, J.C., B. Prezas, R. Herrera y J.L. Miranda, 1994. Sea turtle tagging program in Quintana Roo, Mexico. pp 300-303 In: Procedings of the fourteenth annual symposium on sea turtle biology and conservation. 1-5 March 1994. Bjorndal, K.A,, A.B. Bolten, D.A. Johnson y P.J. Eliazar (compilers). NOAA-TM-NMFS-SEFSC-351.
  • Zurita, J. C., R. Herrera y B. Prezas, 1997.  Catálogo de marcas aplicadas a las tortugas marinas en Quintana Roo (1965 - 1995). El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR),Chetumal, Quintana Roo. mimeo,. 121 pp.

  • Last Modified on December, 1998