Task Centered System Design / Prototyping Grading

HCILectures.TCSDAndPrototypingGradingSheet History

Show minor edits - Show changes to markup

March 29, 2007, at 09:31 AM by 85.241.170.239 -
Changed line 20 from:

(:cellnr :) Table of contents

to:

(:cellnr :) Grading sheet

Changed line 24 from:

(:cellnr :) Grading sheet

to:

(:cellnr :) Table of contents

March 29, 2007, at 09:30 AM by 85.241.170.239 -
Changed line 12 from:

(:cellnr :) Organization in binder, labeled section separators etc)

to:

(:cellnr :) Binder with labeled section separators

March 29, 2007, at 09:30 AM by 85.241.170.239 -
Changed lines 5-6 from:

The points below are just "convenience" checkpoints to help structure the grading. However, the grade is mostly based on your project as a whole; getting many satisfactory checks does not necessarily guarantee a good project.

to:

The points below are just "convenience" checkpoints to help structure the grading. However, the grade is mostly based on your project as a whole; getting many satisfactory checks does not necessarily guarantee a good project.

Changed lines 12-13 from:

(:cellnr :) Follows recommended portfolio design
(binder, labeled index section separators etc)

to:

(:cellnr :) Organization in binder, labeled section separators etc)

Changed lines 16-17 from:

(:cellnr :) Front cover identifciation
(title, names, ids, group #s, email...)

to:

(:cellnr :) Cover has title, names, ids, group #s, email...

March 29, 2007, at 09:27 AM by 85.241.170.239 -
Changed line 34 from:

(:cellnr :) Section 1: Tentative list of requirements

to:

(:cellnr :) Section 1: Concrete task examples

Changed line 38 from:

(:cellnr :) Section 2: Prototype designs

to:

(:cellnr :) Section 1: Tentative list of requirements

Deleted lines 40-41:

(:cell :) O (:cellnr :) Section 2: Walkthrough results

Added line 42:

(:cellnr :) Section 2: Prototype designs

Added lines 44-48:

(:cell :) O (:cell :) O (:cellnr :) Section 2: Walkthrough results (:cell :) O (:cell :) O

Changed line 126 from:

(:cellnr :) Section 1: Concrete task examples

to:

(:cellnr :) Section 1: Concrete task examples

Changed line 188 from:

(:cell :) 0 (wow!) \\

to:

(:cell :) 0 (wow!) \\

Changed line 236 from:

(:cell :) 0 (wow!) \\

to:

(:cell :) 0 (wow!) \\

Changed line 250 from:

(:cell :) 0 (wow!) \\

to:

(:cell :) 0 (wow!) \\

Changed lines 261-263 from:

Note : A is superior report; B is better than expected; C is adequate; D is poor; F is unacceptable Students are invited to see the T.A. for further comments on their report.

to:

'''Note : A is superior report; B is better than expected; C is adequate; D is poor; F is unacceptable Students are invited to see the T.A. for further comments on their report.'''

March 29, 2007, at 09:24 AM by 85.241.170.239 -
Changed lines 10-11 from:

(:cell :) Incomplete portions (:cell :) Satisfactory

to:

(:cell :) Incomplete (:cell :) Satisfactory

Changed line 17 from:

(:cellnr :) Front cover information \\

to:

(:cellnr :) Front cover identifciation\\

Changed lines 108-109 from:

(:cellnr :) indicates any constraints to the design

to:

(:cellnr :) indicates constraints to the design (:cell :) 0 (not relevant)

Deleted line 110:

(:cell :) 0

Added line 121:
Changed lines 168-170 from:

(:cell :) 0 (a token effort) 0 0 (wow!) \\

to:

(:cell :) 0 (a token effort) (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 (wow!) \\

March 29, 2007, at 08:49 AM by 85.241.170.239 -
Changed line 34 from:

(:cellnr :) Section 2: Tentative list of requirements

to:

(:cellnr :) Section 1: Tentative list of requirements

Changed line 38 from:

(:cellnr :) Section 3: Prototype designs

to:

(:cellnr :) Section 2: Prototype designs

Changed line 42 from:

(:cellnr :) Section 4: Walkthrough results

to:

(:cellnr :) Section 2: Walkthrough results

Changed line 100 from:

describes expected users

to:

(:cellnr :) describes expected users

Changed line 104 from:

indicates their context of work

to:

(:cellnr :) indicates their context of work

Changed line 108 from:

indicates any constraints to the design

to:

(:cellnr :) indicates any constraints to the design

Changed line 112 from:

indicates expected uses of system

to:

(:cellnr :) indicates expected uses of system

Changed line 116 from:

sophistication, maturity, and quality

to:

(:cellnr :) sophistication, maturity, and quality

Changed lines 119-125 from:

(:cell :) 0 (wow!)


to:

(:cell :) 0 (wow!)
\\

Changed line 125 from:

situation

to:

(:cellnr :) situation

Changed line 129 from:

exhibit properties of good task examples

to:

(:cellnr :) exhibit properties of good task examples

Changed line 133 from:

accompanying descriptions

to:

(:cellnr :) accompanying descriptions

Changed line 137 from:

good breadth of tasks and users

to:

(:cellnr :) good breadth of tasks and users

Changed line 141 from:

describes how tasks were validated

to:

(:cellnr :) describes how tasks were validated

Changed line 145 from:

sophistication, maturity, and quality

to:

(:cellnr :) sophistication, maturity, and quality

Changed line 155 from:

lists major requirements

to:

(:cellnr :) lists major requirements

Changed line 159 from:

requirements prioritized

to:

(:cellnr :) requirements prioritized

Changed line 163 from:

key users prioritized

to:

(:cellnr :) key users prioritized

Changed line 166 from:

sophistication, maturity, and quality

to:

(:cellnr :) sophistication, maturity, and quality

Changed line 174 from:

preparation

to:

(:cellnr :) preparation

Changed line 178 from:

sophistication, maturity, and quality

to:

(:cellnr :) sophistication, maturity, and quality

Changed line 188 from:

uses prototyping method effectively

to:

(:cellnr :) uses prototyping method effectively

Changed line 192 from:

gives good feel of interface

to:

(:cellnr :) gives good feel of interface

Changed line 196 from:

easy to see how dialog progresses

to:

(:cellnr :) easy to see how dialog progresses

Changed line 200 from:

sophistication, maturity, and quality

to:

(:cellnr :) sophistication, maturity, and quality

Changed lines 210-213 from:

lists major problems and successes of walkthrough steps 0 (an ad-hoc list) 0 0 (shows good walkthrough) summarizes major design flaws (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0

to:

(:cellnr :) lists major problems /successes of walkthrough steps (:cell :) 0 (an ad-hoc list)

Changed lines 213-214 from:

summarizes major design successes

to:

(:cell :)0 (shows good walkthrough) (:cellnr :) summarizes major design flaws

Changed line 218 from:

indicates next direction

to:

(:cellnr :) summarizes major design successes

Changed lines 222-223 from:

sophistication, maturity, and quality (:cell :) 0 (a token effort)

to:

(:cellnr :) indicates next direction

Added lines 224-228:

(:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 (:cellnr :) sophistication, maturity, and quality (:cell :) 0 (a token effort) (:cell :) 0

Changed line 236 from:

preparation

to:

(:cellnr :) preparation

Changed line 240 from:

sophistication, maturity, and quality

to:

(:cellnr :) sophistication, maturity, and quality

March 29, 2007, at 08:45 AM by 85.241.170.239 -
Changed lines 1-2 from:

(:title Task Centered System Design And Prototyping Grading Sheet (13%) :)

to:

(:title Task Centered System Design / Prototyping Grading :)

Changed lines 65-66 from:

(:cell :) 0 (ugly) 0 (:cell :) (acceptable)

to:

(:cell :) 0 (ugly) (:cell :) 0 (acceptable)

Changed lines 74-80 from:

(:cellnr :) Spelling/grammar 0 (proof read!) 0 (minor) 0 (good use of language) (:cellnr :) Section structure 0 (hard to follow) 0 0 (really flows well) (:cellnr :) Clarity of writing 0 (hard to follow) 0 0 (easy to read) (:cellnr :) Style and interest 0 (boring, a yawn) 0 0 (grabbed my interest)
(:cellnr :)

to:

(:cellnr :) Spelling/grammar (:cell :) 0 (proof read!) (:cell :) 0 (minor) (:cell :) 0 (good use of language) (:cellnr :) Section structure (:cell :) 0 (hard to follow) (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 (really flows well) (:cellnr :) Clarity of writing (:cell :) 0 (hard to follow) (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 (easy to read) (:cellnr :) Style and interest (:cell :) 0 (boring, a yawn) (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 (grabbed my interest)

Changed lines 96-101 from:

gives good general background 0 (vague) 0 0 (situates the problem) describes expected users 0 (vague) 0 0 (good detail) indicates their context of work 0 (not relevant) 0 0 (highly relevant, detailed) indicates any constraints to the design 0 0 0 (relevant and realistic) indicates expected uses of system 0 (vague, a grab bag) 0 0 (relevant and realistic) sophistication, maturity, and quality 0 (a token effort) 0 0 (wow!)

to:

(:cellnr :) gives good general background (:cell :) 0 (vague) (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 (situates the problem) describes expected users (:cell :) 0 (vague) (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 (good detail) indicates their context of work (:cell :) 0 (not relevant) (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 (highly relevant, detailed) indicates any constraints to the design (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 (relevant and realistic) indicates expected uses of system (:cell :) 0 (vague, a grab bag) (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 (relevant and realistic) sophistication, maturity, and quality (:cell :) 0 (a token effort) (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 (wow!)

Changed lines 130-142 from:

situation 0 (completely made up) 0 0 (uses real people, real tasks) exhibit properties of good task examples 0 (didn't use them) 0 0 accompanying descriptions 0 (little value added) 0 0 (indicates task nuances) good breadth of tasks and users 0 (key tasks/users missing) 0 0 (good coverage) describes how tasks were validated 0 (didn't) 0 0 (well-validated) sophistication, maturity, and quality 0 (a token effort) 0 0 (wow!)


to:

situation (:cell :) 0 (completely made up) (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 (uses real people, real tasks) exhibit properties of good task examples (:cell :) 0 (didn't use them) (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 accompanying descriptions (:cell :) 0 (little value added) (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 (indicates task nuances) good breadth of tasks and users (:cell :) 0 (key tasks/users missing) (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 (good coverage) describes how tasks were validated (:cell :) 0 (didn't) (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 (well-validated) sophistication, maturity, and quality (:cell :) 0 (a token effort) (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 (wow!)

Changed lines 160-169 from:

lists major requirements 0 (an ad-hoc list) 0 0 (shows good insight) requirements prioritized 0 (odd set of priorities) 0 0 (good choices) key users prioritized 0 (odd set of users) 0 0 (good choices) sophistication, maturity, and quality 0 (a token effort) 0 0 (wow!)


to:

lists major requirements (:cell :) 0 (an ad-hoc list) (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 (shows good insight) requirements prioritized (:cell :) 0 (odd set of priorities) (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 (good choices) key users prioritized (:cell :) 0 (odd set of users) (:cell :) 0 0 (good choices) sophistication, maturity, and quality (:cell :) 0 (a token effort) 0 0 (wow!)

Changed lines 179-186 from:

preparation 0 (didn't have it ready) 0 0 (well-prepared, organized) sophistication, maturity, and quality 0 (a token effort) 0 0 (wow!)


to:

preparation (:cell :) 0 (didn't have it ready) (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 (well-prepared, organized) sophistication, maturity, and quality (:cell :) 0 (a token effort) (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 (wow!) \\

 
Changed lines 193-202 from:

uses prototyping method effectively 0 (method not used well) 0 0 (excellent use of method) gives good feel of interface 0 0 0 easy to see how dialog progresses 0 0 0 sophistication, maturity, and quality 0 (a token effort) 0 0 (wow!)


to:

uses prototyping method effectively (:cell :) 0 (method not used well) (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 (excellent use of method) gives good feel of interface (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 easy to see how dialog progresses (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 sophistication, maturity, and quality (:cell :) 0 (a token effort) (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 (wow!)

Changed lines 216-225 from:

summarizes major design flaws 0 0 0 summarizes major design successes 0 0 0 indicates next direction 0 0 0 sophistication, maturity, and quality 0 (a token effort) 0 0 (wow!)

  0 0 0 


to:

summarizes major design flaws (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 summarizes major design successes (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 indicates next direction (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 sophistication, maturity, and quality (:cell :) 0 (a token effort) (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 (wow!) \\

 
Changed lines 238-242 from:

preparation 0 (didn't have it ready) 0 0 (well-prepared, organized) sophistication, maturity, and quality 0 (a token effort) 0 0 (wow!)

\\

to:

preparation (:cell :) 0 (didn't have it ready) (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 (well-prepared, organized) sophistication, maturity, and quality (:cell :) 0 (a token effort) (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 (wow!) \\

 \\
March 29, 2007, at 08:38 AM by 85.241.170.239 -
Changed lines 12-13 from:

(:cellnr :) Follows recommended portfolio design (binder, labeled index section separators etc)

to:

(:cellnr :) Follows recommended portfolio design
(binder, labeled index section separators etc)

Changed lines 17-18 from:

(:cellnr :) Front cover information (title, names, ids, group #s, email...)

to:

(:cellnr :) Front cover information
(title, names, ids, group #s, email...)

Added lines 41-42:

(:cell :) O (:cellnr :) Section 4: Walkthrough results

Deleted line 43:

(:cellnr :) Section 4: Walkthrough results

Changed lines 45-46 from:

(:cell :) O (:cell :) O

to:

(:cell :) O

Changed lines 68-69 from:

(:tableend:)

to:


(:cellnr :) Language and writing style (:cell :) (:cell :) (:cell :) (:cellnr :) Spelling/grammar 0 (proof read!) 0 (minor) 0 (good use of language) (:cellnr :) Section structure 0 (hard to follow) 0 0 (really flows well) (:cellnr :) Clarity of writing 0 (hard to follow) 0 0 (easy to read) (:cellnr :) Style and interest 0 (boring, a yawn) 0 0 (grabbed my interest)
(:cellnr :) (:cellnr :) Section 1: Introduction (:cell :) (:cell :) (:cell :) gives good general background 0 (vague) 0 0 (situates the problem) describes expected users 0 (vague) 0 0 (good detail) indicates their context of work 0 (not relevant) 0 0 (highly relevant, detailed) indicates any constraints to the design 0 0 0 (relevant and realistic) indicates expected uses of system 0 (vague, a grab bag) 0 0 (relevant and realistic) sophistication, maturity, and quality 0 (a token effort) 0 0 (wow!)


(:cellnr :) Section 1: Concrete task examples (:cell :) (:cell :) (:cell :) situation 0 (completely made up) 0 0 (uses real people, real tasks) exhibit properties of good task examples 0 (didn't use them) 0 0 accompanying descriptions 0 (little value added) 0 0 (indicates task nuances) good breadth of tasks and users 0 (key tasks/users missing) 0 0 (good coverage) describes how tasks were validated 0 (didn't) 0 0 (well-validated) sophistication, maturity, and quality 0 (a token effort) 0 0 (wow!)


(:cellnr :) Section 1: Tentative requirements list (:cell :) (:cell :) (:cell :) lists major requirements 0 (an ad-hoc list) 0 0 (shows good insight) requirements prioritized 0 (odd set of priorities) 0 0 (good choices) key users prioritized 0 (odd set of users) 0 0 (good choices) sophistication, maturity, and quality 0 (a token effort) 0 0 (wow!)


(:cellnr :) Lab presentation of the above (:cell :) (:cell :) (:cell :) preparation 0 (didn't have it ready) 0 0 (well-prepared, organized) sophistication, maturity, and quality 0 (a token effort) 0 0 (wow!)


(:cellnr :) Section 2: Prototype designs (:cell :) (:cell :) (:cell :) uses prototyping method effectively 0 (method not used well) 0 0 (excellent use of method) gives good feel of interface 0 0 0 easy to see how dialog progresses 0 0 0 sophistication, maturity, and quality 0 (a token effort) 0 0 (wow!)


(:cellnr :) Section 2: Walkthrough results (:cell :) (:cell :) (:cell :) lists major problems and successes of walkthrough steps 0 (an ad-hoc list) 0 0 (shows good walkthrough) summarizes major design flaws 0 0 0 summarizes major design successes 0 0 0 indicates next direction 0 0 0 sophistication, maturity, and quality 0 (a token effort) 0 0 (wow!)

  0 0 0 


(:cellnr :) Lab presentation of the above (:cell :) (:cell :) (:cell :) preparation 0 (didn't have it ready) 0 0 (well-prepared, organized) sophistication, maturity, and quality 0 (a token effort) 0 0 (wow!)


(:cellnr :) Overall impression (:cell :) 0 (a token effort) (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 (wow!) (:tableend:)

Grade: A+ ... A ... A- ... B+ ... B ... B- ... C+ ... C .... C- ... D+ ... D ... D- ... F+ ... F ... F-

Note : A is superior report; B is better than expected; C is adequate; D is poor; F is unacceptable Students are invited to see the T.A. for further comments on their report.

March 29, 2007, at 08:29 AM by 85.241.170.239 -
Changed line 16 from:

(:cellnr :) front cover information (title, names, ids, group #s, email...)

to:

(:cellnr :) Front cover information (title, names, ids, group #s, email...)

Changed line 20 from:

(:cellnr :) table of contents

to:

(:cellnr :) Table of contents

Changed line 24 from:

(:cellnr :) grading sheet

to:

(:cellnr :) Grading sheet

Added lines 44-64:

(:cellnr :) Appearance (:cell :) Poor (:cell :) Okay (:cell :) Great (:cellnr :) Organization (:cell :) 0 (hard to follow) (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 (well organized) (:cellnr :) use of white space (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 (:cellnr :) use of illustrations (if any) (:cell :) 0 (adds little) (:cell :) 0 (:cell :) 0 (really helps) (:cellnr :) overall visual appearance (:cell :) 0 (ugly) 0 (:cell :) (acceptable) (:cell :) 0 (wow!)

March 29, 2007, at 08:24 AM by 85.241.170.239 -
Changed lines 4-5 from:

Note. The points below are just "convenience" checkpoints to help structure the grading. However, the grade is mostly based on your project as a whole; getting many satisfactory checks does not necessarily guarantee a good project.

to:

The points below are just "convenience" checkpoints to help structure the grading. However, the grade is mostly based on your project as a whole; getting many satisfactory checks does not necessarily guarantee a good project.

(:table:) (:cellnr :) Completeness of Portfolio (:cell :) Missing (:cell :) Incomplete portions (:cell :) Satisfactory (:cellnr :) Follows recommended portfolio design (binder, labeled index section separators etc) (:cell :) O (:cell :) O (:cell :) O (:cellnr :) front cover information (title, names, ids, group #s, email...) (:cell :) O (:cell :) O (:cell :) O (:cellnr :) table of contents (:cell :) O (:cell :) O (:cell :) O (:cellnr :) grading sheet (:cell :) O (:cell :) O (:cell :) O (:cellnr :) Section 1: Introduction (:cell :) O (:cell :) O (:cell :) O (:cellnr :) Section 2: Tentative list of requirements (:cell :) O (:cell :) O (:cell :) O (:cellnr :) Section 3: Prototype designs (:cell :) O (:cell :) O (:cell :) O (:cellnr :) Section 4: Walkthrough results (:cell :) O (:cell :) O (:cell :) O (:tableend:)

March 29, 2007, at 08:17 AM by 85.241.170.239 -
Added lines 1-5:

(:title Task Centered System Design And Prototyping Grading Sheet (13%) :)

Student IDs ________________ ________________ ________________ Note. The points below are just "convenience" checkpoints to help structure the grading. However, the grade is mostly based on your project as a whole; getting many satisfactory checks does not necessarily guarantee a good project.