Task Centered System Design / Prototyping Grading

HCILectures.TCSDAndPrototypingGradingSheet History

Show minor edits - Show changes to output

March 29, 2007, at 09:31 AM by 85.241.170.239 -
Changed line 20 from:
(:cellnr :) Table of contents
to:
(:cellnr :) Grading sheet
Changed line 24 from:
(:cellnr :) Grading sheet
to:
(:cellnr :) Table of contents
March 29, 2007, at 09:30 AM by 85.241.170.239 -
Changed line 12 from:
(:cellnr :) Organization in binder, labeled section separators etc)
to:
(:cellnr :) Binder with labeled section separators
March 29, 2007, at 09:30 AM by 85.241.170.239 -
Changed lines 5-6 from:
'-''The points below are just "convenience" checkpoints to help structure the grading. However, the grade is mostly based on your project as a whole; getting many satisfactory checks does not necessarily guarantee a good project.''-'
to:
''The points below are just "convenience" checkpoints to help structure the grading. However, the grade is mostly based on your project as a whole; getting many satisfactory checks does not necessarily guarantee a good project.''
Changed lines 12-13 from:
(:cellnr :) Follows recommended portfolio design \\
'-(binder, labeled index section separators
etc-')
to:
(:cellnr :) Organization in binder, labeled section separators etc)
Changed lines 16-17 from:
(:cellnr :) Front cover identifciation\\
'-(
title, names, ids, group #s, email...)-'
to:
(:cellnr :) Cover has title, names, ids, group #s, email...
March 29, 2007, at 09:27 AM by 85.241.170.239 -
Changed line 34 from:
(:cellnr :) Section 1: Tentative list of requirements
to:
(:cellnr :) Section 1: Concrete task examples
Changed line 38 from:
(:cellnr :) Section 2: Prototype designs
to:
(:cellnr :) Section 1: Tentative list of requirements
Deleted lines 40-41:
(:cell :) O
(:cellnr :) Section 2: Walkthrough results
Added line 42:
(:cellnr :) Section 2: Prototype designs
Added lines 44-48:
(:cell :) O
(:cell :) O
(:cellnr :) Section 2: Walkthrough results
(:cell :) O
(:cell :) O
Changed line 126 from:
(:cellnr :) Section 1: Concrete task examples
to:
(:cellnr :) '''Section 1: Concrete task examples'''
Changed line 188 from:
(:cell :) 0 (wow!) \\
to:
(:cell :) 0 (wow!) \\
Changed line 236 from:
(:cell :) 0 (wow!) \\
to:
(:cell :) 0 (wow!) \\
Changed line 250 from:
(:cell :) 0 (wow!) \\
to:
(:cell :) 0 (wow!) \\
Changed lines 261-263 from:
Note : A is superior report; B is better than expected; C is adequate; D is poor; F is unacceptable
Students are invited to see the T.A. for further comments on their report.
to:
'''Note : A is superior report; B is better than expected; C is adequate; D is poor; F is unacceptable
Students are invited to see the T.A. for further comments on their report.'''
March 29, 2007, at 09:24 AM by 85.241.170.239 -
Changed lines 10-11 from:
(:cell :) '''Incomplete portions'''
(:cell :) '''Satisfactor'''y
to:
(:cell :) '''Incomplete'''
(:cell :) '''Satisfactory'''
Changed line 17 from:
(:cellnr :) Front cover information \\
to:
(:cellnr :) Front cover identifciation\\
Changed lines 108-109 from:
(:cellnr :) indicates any constraints to the design
to:
(:cellnr :) indicates constraints to the design
(:cell :) 0 (not relevant)
Deleted line 110:
(:cell :) 0
Added line 121:
Changed lines 168-170 from:
(:cell :) 0 (a token effort) 0 0 (wow!) \\
to:
(:cell :) 0 (a token effort)
(:cell :) 0
(:cell :)
0 (wow!) \\
March 29, 2007, at 08:49 AM by 85.241.170.239 -
Changed line 34 from:
(:cellnr :) Section 2: Tentative list of requirements
to:
(:cellnr :) Section 1: Tentative list of requirements
Changed line 38 from:
(:cellnr :) Section 3: Prototype designs
to:
(:cellnr :) Section 2: Prototype designs
Changed line 42 from:
(:cellnr :) Section 4: Walkthrough results
to:
(:cellnr :) Section 2: Walkthrough results
Changed line 100 from:
describes expected users
to:
(:cellnr :) describes expected users
Changed line 104 from:
indicates their context of work
to:
(:cellnr :) indicates their context of work
Changed line 108 from:
indicates any constraints to the design
to:
(:cellnr :) indicates any constraints to the design
Changed line 112 from:
indicates expected uses of system
to:
(:cellnr :) indicates expected uses of system
Changed line 116 from:
sophistication, maturity, and quality
to:
(:cellnr :) sophistication, maturity, and quality
Changed lines 119-125 from:
(:cell :) 0 (wow!)




\\
to:
(:cell :) 0 (wow!) \\
\\
Changed line 125 from:
situation
to:
(:cellnr :) situation
Changed line 129 from:
exhibit properties of good task examples
to:
(:cellnr :) exhibit properties of good task examples
Changed line 133 from:
accompanying descriptions
to:
(:cellnr :) accompanying descriptions
Changed line 137 from:
good breadth of tasks and users
to:
(:cellnr :) good breadth of tasks and users
Changed line 141 from:
describes how tasks were validated
to:
(:cellnr :) describes how tasks were validated
Changed line 145 from:
sophistication, maturity, and quality
to:
(:cellnr :) sophistication, maturity, and quality
Changed line 155 from:
lists major requirements
to:
(:cellnr :) lists major requirements
Changed line 159 from:
requirements prioritized
to:
(:cellnr :) requirements prioritized
Changed line 163 from:
key users prioritized
to:
(:cellnr :) key users prioritized
Changed line 166 from:
sophistication, maturity, and quality
to:
(:cellnr :) sophistication, maturity, and quality
Changed line 174 from:
preparation
to:
(:cellnr :) preparation
Changed line 178 from:
sophistication, maturity, and quality
to:
(:cellnr :) sophistication, maturity, and quality
Changed line 188 from:
uses prototyping method effectively
to:
(:cellnr :) uses prototyping method effectively
Changed line 192 from:
gives good feel of interface
to:
(:cellnr :) gives good feel of interface
Changed line 196 from:
easy to see how dialog progresses
to:
(:cellnr :) easy to see how dialog progresses
Changed line 200 from:
sophistication, maturity, and quality
to:
(:cellnr :) sophistication, maturity, and quality
Changed lines 210-213 from:
lists major problems and successes of walkthrough steps 0 (an ad-hoc list) 0 0 (shows good walkthrough)
summarizes major design flaws
(:cell :) 0
(:cell :) 0
to:
(:cellnr :) lists major problems /successes of walkthrough steps
(:cell :) 0 (an ad-hoc list)
Changed lines 213-214 from:
summarizes major design successes
to:
(:cell :)0 (shows good walkthrough)
(:cellnr :) summarizes major design flaws
Changed line 218 from:
indicates next direction
to:
(:cellnr :) summarizes major design successes
Changed lines 222-223 from:
sophistication, maturity, and quality
(:cell :) 0 (a token effort)
to:
(:cellnr :) indicates next direction
Added lines 224-228:
(:cell :) 0
(:cell :) 0
(:cellnr :) sophistication, maturity, and quality
(:cell :) 0 (a token effort)
(:cell :) 0
Changed line 236 from:
preparation
to:
(:cellnr :) preparation
Changed line 240 from:
sophistication, maturity, and quality
to:
(:cellnr :) sophistication, maturity, and quality
March 29, 2007, at 08:45 AM by 85.241.170.239 -
Changed lines 1-2 from:
(:title Task Centered System Design And Prototyping Grading Sheet (13%) :)
to:
(:title Task Centered System Design / Prototyping Grading :)
Changed lines 65-66 from:
(:cell :) 0 (ugly) 0
(:cell :) (acceptable)
to:
(:cell :) 0 (ugly)
(:cell :) 0 (acceptable)
Changed lines 74-80 from:
(:cellnr :) Spelling/grammar 0 (proof read!) 0 (minor) 0 (good use of language)
(:cellnr :) Section structure 0 (hard to follow) 0 0 (really flows well)
(:cellnr :) Clarity of writing 0 (hard to follow) 0 0 (easy to read)
(:cellnr :) Style and interest 0 (boring, a yawn) 0 0 (grabbed my interest)
\\

(:cellnr :)
to:
(:cellnr :) Spelling/grammar
(:cell :) 0 (proof read!)
(:cell :) 0 (minor)
(:cell :)
0 (good use of language)
(:cellnr :) Section structure
(:cell :) 0 (hard to follow)
(:cell :)
0
(:cell :)
0 (really flows well)
(:cellnr :) Clarity of writing
(:cell :) 0 (hard to follow)
(:cell :) 0
(:cell :) 0 (easy to read)
(:cellnr :) Style and interest
(:cell :) 0 (boring, a yawn)
(:cell :) 0
(:cell :) 0 (grabbed my interest) \\
\\
Changed lines 96-101 from:
gives good general background 0 (vague) 0 0 (situates the problem)
describes expected users 0 (vague) 0 0 (good detail)
indicates their context of work 0 (not relevant) 0 0 (highly relevant, detailed)
indicates any constraints to the design
0 0 0 (relevant and realistic)
indicates expected uses of system 0 (vague, a grab bag) 0 0 (relevant and realistic)
sophistication, maturity, and quality 0 (a token effort) 0 0 (wow!)
to:
(:cellnr :) gives good general background
(:cell :) 0 (vague)
(:cell :) 0
(:cell :) 0 (situates the problem)
describes expected users

(:cell :) 0 (vague)
(:cell :)
0
(:cell :) 0 (good detail)
indicates their context of work
(:cell :)
0 (not relevant)
(:cell :) 0
(:cell :) 0 (highly relevant, detailed)
indicates any constraints to the design
(:cell :) 0
(:cell :) 0
(:cell :) 0 (relevant and realistic)
indicates expected uses of system
(:cell :) 0 (vague, a grab bag)
(:cell :) 0
(:cell :) 0 (relevant and realistic)
sophistication, maturity, and quality
(:cell :) 0 (a token effort)
(:cell :) 0
(:cell :)
0 (wow!)
Changed lines 130-142 from:
situation 0 (completely made up) 0 0 (uses real people, real tasks)
exhibit properties of good task examples
0 (didn't use them) 0 0
accompanying descriptions 0 (little value added) 0
0 (indicates task nuances)
good breadth of tasks and users 0 (key tasks/users missing) 0 0 (good coverage)
describes how tasks were validated 0 (didn't) 0 0 (well-validated)
sophistication, maturity, and quality 0 (a token effort) 0 0 (wow!)





\\
to:
situation
(:cell :
) 0 (completely made up)
(:cell :
) 0
(:cell :)
0 (uses real people, real tasks)
exhibit properties of good task examples
(:cell :)
0 (didn't use them)
(:cell :) 0

(:cell :
) 0
accompanying descriptions

(:cell :) 0 (little value added
)
(:cell :) 0
(:cell :) 0 (indicates task nuances)
good breadth of tasks and users

(:cell :) 0 (key tasks/users missing)
(:cell :) 0
(:cell :) 0 (good coverage)
describes how tasks were validated
(:cell :) 0 (didn't)
(:cell :) 0
(:cell :) 0 (well-validated)
sophistication, maturity, and quality
(:cell :) 0 (a token effort)
(:cell :) 0
(:cell :) 0 (wow!) \\
\\
Changed lines 160-169 from:
lists major requirements 0 (an ad-hoc list) 0 0 (shows good insight)
requirements prioritized 0 (odd set of priorities) 0 0 (good choices)
key users prioritized 0 (odd set of users) 0 0 (good choices)
sophistication, maturity, and quality 0 (a token effort) 0 0 (wow!)




\\
to:
lists major requirements
(:cell :
) 0 (an ad-hoc list)
(:cell :) 0
(:cell :)
0 (shows good insight)
requirements prioritized
(:cell :)
0 (odd set of priorities)
(:cell :)
0
(:cell :)
0 (good choices)
key users prioritized
(:cell :) 0 (odd set of users)
(:cell :) 0 0 (good choices)
sophistication, maturity, and quality
(:cell :) 0 (a token effort) 0 0 (wow!) \\
\\
Changed lines 179-186 from:
preparation 0 (didn't have it ready) 0 0 (well-prepared, organized)
sophistication, maturity, and quality
0 (a token effort) 0 0 (wow!)




\\
to:
preparation
(:cell :) 0 (didn't have it ready)
(:cell :) 0
(:cell :) 0 (well-prepared, organized)
sophistication, maturity, and quality

(:cell :) 0 (a token effort)
(:cell :) 0
(:cell :) 0 (wow!) \\
\\
Changed lines 193-202 from:
uses prototyping method effectively 0 (method not used well) 0 0 (excellent use of method)
gives good feel of interface 0 0 0
easy to see how dialog progresses 0
0 0
sophistication, maturity, and quality 0 (a token effort) 0 0 (wow!)




\\
to:
uses prototyping method effectively
(:cell :)
0 (method not used well)
(:cell :) 0
(:cell :) 0 (excellent use of method)
gives good feel of interface

(:cell :)
0
(:cell :)
0
(:cell :)
0
easy to see how dialog progresses
(:cell :) 0
(:cell :) 0
(:cell :) 0
sophistication, maturity, and quality
(:cell :) 0 (a token effort)
(:cell :) 0
(:cell :) 0 (wow!) \\
\\
Changed lines 216-225 from:
summarizes major design flaws 0 0 0
summarizes major design successes 0 0 0
indicates next direction 0 0 0
sophistication, maturity, and quality
0 (a token effort) 0 0 (wow!)
0 0 0



\\
to:
summarizes major design flaws
(:cell :) 0
(:cell :)
0
(:cell :)
0
summarizes major design successes

(:cell :) 0
(:cell :)
0
(:cell :) 0
indicates next direction

(:cell :) 0
(:cell :) 0
(:cell :) 0
sophistication, maturity, and quality
(:cell :) 0 (a token effort)
(:cell :) 0
(:cell :) 0 (wow!) \\
\\
Changed lines 238-242 from:
preparation 0 (didn't have it ready) 0 0 (well-prepared, organized)
sophistication, maturity, and quality
0 (a token effort) 0 0 (wow!)


\\
to:
preparation
(:cell :) 0 (didn't have it ready)
(:cell :) 0
(:cell :) 0 (well-prepared, organized)
sophistication, maturity, and quality

(:cell :) 0 (a token effort)
(:cell :) 0
(:cell :) 0 (wow!) \\
\\
March 29, 2007, at 08:38 AM by 85.241.170.239 -
Changed lines 12-13 from:
(:cellnr :) Follows recommended portfolio design '-(binder, labeled index section separators etc-')
to:
(:cellnr :) Follows recommended portfolio design \\
'-(binder, labeled index section separators etc-')
Changed lines 17-18 from:
(:cellnr :) Front cover information '-(title, names, ids, group #s, email...)-'
to:
(:cellnr :) Front cover information \\
'-(title, names, ids, group #s, email...)-'
Added lines 41-42:
(:cell :) O
(:cellnr :) Section 4: Walkthrough results
Deleted line 43:
(:cellnr :) Section 4: Walkthrough results
Changed lines 45-46 from:
(:cell :) O
(:cell :) O
to:
(:cell :) O \\
\\
Changed lines 68-69 from:

(:tableend:)
to:
\\

(:cellnr :) '''Language and writing style'''
(:cell :)
(:cell :)
(:cell :)
(:cellnr :) Spelling/grammar 0 (proof read!) 0 (minor) 0 (good use of language)
(:cellnr :) Section structure 0 (hard to follow) 0 0 (really flows well)
(:cellnr :) Clarity of writing 0 (hard to follow) 0 0 (easy to read)
(:cellnr :) Style and interest 0 (boring, a yawn) 0 0 (grabbed my interest)
\\

(:cellnr :)
(:cellnr :) '''Section 1: Introduction'''
(:cell :)
(:cell :)
(:cell :)
gives good general background 0 (vague) 0 0 (situates the problem)
describes expected users 0 (vague) 0 0 (good detail)
indicates their context of work 0 (not relevant) 0 0 (highly relevant, detailed)
indicates any constraints to the design 0 0 0 (relevant and realistic)
indicates expected uses of system 0 (vague, a grab bag) 0 0 (relevant and realistic)
sophistication, maturity, and quality 0 (a token effort) 0 0 (wow!)




\\

(:cellnr :) Section 1: Concrete task examples
(:cell :)
(:cell :)
(:cell :)
situation 0 (completely made up) 0 0 (uses real people, real tasks)
exhibit properties of good task examples 0 (didn't use them) 0 0
accompanying descriptions 0 (little value added) 0 0 (indicates task nuances)
good breadth of tasks and users 0 (key tasks/users missing) 0 0 (good coverage)
describes how tasks were validated 0 (didn't) 0 0 (well-validated)
sophistication, maturity, and quality 0 (a token effort) 0 0 (wow!)





\\

(:cellnr :) '''Section 1: Tentative requirements list'''
(:cell :)
(:cell :)
(:cell :)
lists major requirements 0 (an ad-hoc list) 0 0 (shows good insight)
requirements prioritized 0 (odd set of priorities) 0 0 (good choices)
key users prioritized 0 (odd set of users) 0 0 (good choices)
sophistication, maturity, and quality 0 (a token effort) 0 0 (wow!)




\\

(:cellnr :) '''Lab presentation of the above'''
(:cell :)
(:cell :)
(:cell :)
preparation 0 (didn't have it ready) 0 0 (well-prepared, organized)
sophistication, maturity, and quality 0 (a token effort) 0 0 (wow!)




\\

(:cellnr :) '''Section 2: Prototype designs'''
(:cell :)
(:cell :)
(:cell :)
uses prototyping method effectively 0 (method not used well) 0 0 (excellent use of method)
gives good feel of interface 0 0 0
easy to see how dialog progresses 0 0 0
sophistication, maturity, and quality 0 (a token effort) 0 0 (wow!)




\\

(:cellnr :) '''Section 2: Walkthrough results'''
(:cell :)
(:cell :)
(:cell :)
lists major problems and successes of walkthrough steps 0 (an ad-hoc list) 0 0 (shows good walkthrough)
summarizes major design flaws 0 0 0
summarizes major design successes 0 0 0
indicates next direction 0 0 0
sophistication, maturity, and quality 0 (a token effort) 0 0 (wow!)
0 0 0



\\

(:cellnr :) '''Lab presentation of the above'''
(:cell :)
(:cell :)
(:cell :)
preparation 0 (didn't have it ready) 0 0 (well-prepared, organized)
sophistication, maturity, and quality 0 (a token effort) 0 0 (wow!)


\\

(:cellnr :) '''Overall impression'''
(:cell :) '''0 (a token effort)'''
(:cell :) '''0'''
(:cell :) '''0 (wow!)'''
(:tableend:)

Grade: A+ ... A ... A- ... B+ ... B ... B- ... C+ ... C .... C- ... D+ ... D ... D- ... F+ ... F ... F-

Note : A is superior report; B is better than expected; C is adequate; D is poor; F is unacceptable
Students are invited to see the T.A. for further comments on their report.
March 29, 2007, at 08:29 AM by 85.241.170.239 -
Changed line 16 from:
(:cellnr :) front cover information '-(title, names, ids, group #s, email...)-'
to:
(:cellnr :) Front cover information '-(title, names, ids, group #s, email...)-'
Changed line 20 from:
(:cellnr :) table of contents
to:
(:cellnr :) Table of contents
Changed line 24 from:
(:cellnr :) grading sheet
to:
(:cellnr :) Grading sheet
Added lines 44-64:
(:cellnr :) '''Appearance'''
(:cell :) '''Poor'''
(:cell :) '''Okay'''
(:cell :) '''Great'''
(:cellnr :) Organization
(:cell :) 0 (hard to follow)
(:cell :) 0
(:cell :) 0 (well organized)
(:cellnr :) use of white space
(:cell :) 0
(:cell :) 0
(:cell :) 0
(:cellnr :) use of illustrations (if any)
(:cell :) 0 (adds little)
(:cell :) 0
(:cell :) 0 (really helps)
(:cellnr :) overall visual appearance
(:cell :) 0 (ugly) 0
(:cell :) (acceptable)
(:cell :) 0 (wow!)
March 29, 2007, at 08:24 AM by 85.241.170.239 -
Changed lines 4-5 from:
Note. The points below are just "convenience" checkpoints to help structure the grading. However, the grade is mostly based on your project as a whole; getting many satisfactory checks does not necessarily guarantee a good project.
to:

'-''The points below are just "convenience" checkpoints to help structure the grading. However, the grade is mostly based on your project as a whole; getting many satisfactory checks does not necessarily guarantee a good project.''-'

(:table:)
(:cellnr :) '''Completeness of Portfolio'''
(:cell :) '''Missing'''
(:cell :) '''Incomplete portions'''
(:cell :) '''Satisfactor'''y
(:cellnr :) Follows recommended portfolio design '-(binder, labeled index section separators etc-')
(:cell :) O
(:cell :) O
(:cell :) O
(:cellnr :) front cover information '-(title, names, ids, group #s, email...)-'
(:cell :) O
(:cell :) O
(:cell :) O
(:cellnr :) table of contents
(:cell :) O
(:cell :) O
(:cell :) O
(:cellnr :) grading sheet
(:cell :) O
(:cell :) O
(:cell :) O
(:cellnr :) Section 1: Introduction
(:cell :) O
(:cell :) O
(:cell :) O
(:cellnr :) Section 2: Tentative list of requirements
(:cell :) O
(:cell :) O
(:cell :) O
(:cellnr :) Section 3: Prototype designs
(:cell :) O
(:cell :) O
(:cell :) O
(:cellnr :) Section 4: Walkthrough results
(:cell :) O
(:cell :) O
(:cell :) O
(:tableend:)
March 29, 2007, at 08:17 AM by 85.241.170.239 -
Added lines 1-5:
(:title Task Centered System Design And Prototyping Grading Sheet (13%) :)

Student IDs ________________ ________________ ________________
Note. The points below are just "convenience" checkpoints to help structure the grading. However, the grade is mostly based on your project as a whole; getting many satisfactory checks does not necessarily guarantee a good project.