Spearhead Traverse - Whistler, BC. (GPS and Maps)

Personal.SpearheadTraverse History

Show minor edits - Show changes to output

Changed lines 2-23 from:
'''-[[Personal/TripsAndMaps|Return to Saul Greenberg's Trips and Maps]]-'''
%rfloat% Maps
:SpearheadTraverse.JPG \\
photo: Saul Greenberg
* [[Maps:SpearheadTraverse.pdf|Maps
]] and [[Maps:SpearheadTraverse.gdb|GPS data]].
* Ski Traverse appropriate for competent ski mountaineers
* ~41 kms total (according to my GPS), exiting via Singing Pass.
* 1 day (for speed skiers), 2 days (for fast tourers with a heavy pack), 3 days (in case of bad weather and for the odd ski ascent), 4 or more (to ski/climb all the peaks your heart may desire). I've been told its been done in 4 hours. Gasp.
* Elevation gain: See the profile included on the map. What makes this superb is that you gain a huge amount of elevation by taking lifts to the top of Blackcomb. While there is still lots of up and down (~2000m overall), most of the elevation gains are modest (i.e., a few hundred meters between cols and gaps)
* Trailhead: Blackcomb ski area, taking lifts to the top.

'''Opinion'''. This route has been on my list for years. While its probably one of the most often done ski traverses in Canada, it is truly spectacular. What blew me away about it was how this route goes through big mountain country, yet it manages to thread its way through these spectacular peaks via relatively gentle glaciers in between a myriad of high cols. In late spring (when I did it) the glaciers were so well covered that crevasses on the route were almost invisible.

Numerous people do this in a single day, and this is very achievable by a fit and knowledgeable skier. But I must admit that I would only do that if the weather and snow looked perfect (or if I was very very familiar with the route). For example, we (my son Adam and I) started off on a great day, but by 2pm we couldn't see 10 feet in front of us. So we camped. Even if you have a GPS, you probably want to avoid travelling in a severe whiteout because there are a few cliffs, wind rolls, etc. But even more important, a major point of this trip is the spectacular views.

And what about the skiing? If you do the trip strictly as a tour without any ski ascents, you'll find the skiing somewhat ho-hum, as most of the time you are sidehilling up and down glaciers. There aren't really that many great descents. But (and this is a big but) if you have the time, you can do an incredible amount of skiing on the slopes that you pass by. You can also ascend myriads of peaks along the way - most are a short distance from your high points. So the amount of ski yeehaws depends on you. If you just want to get through the traverse, its a great tour. If you want to take the time and camp out several days, you can do tons of incredible skiing.

'''Fact'''. I'm not going to tell you the way. The enclosed maps and GPS data (which include waypoints and the route track) should be considered a supplement to the commercial map titled 'Backcountry Whistler' (aka John Baldwin's map) which shows not only the primary route, but variations and ski ascents. Baldwin's book also has route description. But I was surprised how hard it was to find a detailed GPS route, which is why I include mine here. My maps are also very small scale, so you will also see small terrain features that are a bit harder to spot on Baldwin's map. Take both.

'''Cautionary notes.'''
* There are several small variations, where you can avoid some elevation loss by traversing steeper slopes. Take care on these. Some can be quite exposed, especially if the avalanche conditions are not great or the sun is shining. If lighting is bad and you are following other people's tracks, you may get sucked onto a variation without realizing it. I think that the 1-day skiers mostly take these, because they are not burdened by heavy packs. But having said that, we did them all but one: we turned back from under Mt. Fitsimmons because we didn't like the snow conditions on it.
* Even though much of the route travels on low-angle glaciers, it sometimes traverses under steep slopes above. Again, watch for avalanche conditions.
* Glaciers. They are pretty awesome. But there are big holes under all that snow. Ropes, harnesses, etc... but its up to you.
to:
!!This page has been moved to [[http://saul.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/pmwiki.php/Personal/SpearheadTraverse|'''my new web site''']]
April 25, 2011, at 11:58 PM by 24.64.76.54 -
Changed lines 14-15 from:
Many people do this in a single day, and this is very achievable by a fit skier. But I must admit that I would only do that if the weather and snow looked perfect (or if I was very very familiar with the route). For example, we (my son Adam and I) started off on a great day, but by 2pm we couldn't see 10 feet in front of us. So we camped. Even if you have a GPS, you probably want to avoid travelling in a severe whiteout because there are a few cliffs, wind rolls, etc. But even more important, a major point of this trip is the spectacular views.
to:
Numerous people do this in a single day, and this is very achievable by a fit and knowledgeable skier. But I must admit that I would only do that if the weather and snow looked perfect (or if I was very very familiar with the route). For example, we (my son Adam and I) started off on a great day, but by 2pm we couldn't see 10 feet in front of us. So we camped. Even if you have a GPS, you probably want to avoid travelling in a severe whiteout because there are a few cliffs, wind rolls, etc. But even more important, a major point of this trip is the spectacular views.
April 25, 2011, at 11:57 PM by 24.64.76.54 -
Changed line 8 from:
* 1 day (for speed skiers), 2 days (for fast touring with a heavy pack), 3 days (in case of bad weather and for the odd ski ascent), 4 or more (to ski/climb all the peaks your heart may desire). I've been told its been done in 4 hours. Gasp.
to:
* 1 day (for speed skiers), 2 days (for fast tourers with a heavy pack), 3 days (in case of bad weather and for the odd ski ascent), 4 or more (to ski/climb all the peaks your heart may desire). I've been told its been done in 4 hours. Gasp.
April 25, 2011, at 11:57 PM by 24.64.76.54 -
Changed line 8 from:
* 1 day (for speed skiers), 2 days (for fast touring with a heavy pack), 3 days (in case of bad weather and for the odd ski ascent), 4 or more (to ski/climb whatever all the peaks your heart may desire). I've been told its been done in 4 hours. Gasp.
to:
* 1 day (for speed skiers), 2 days (for fast touring with a heavy pack), 3 days (in case of bad weather and for the odd ski ascent), 4 or more (to ski/climb all the peaks your heart may desire). I've been told its been done in 4 hours. Gasp.
April 25, 2011, at 11:56 PM by 24.64.76.54 -
Added line 8:
* 1 day (for speed skiers), 2 days (for fast touring with a heavy pack), 3 days (in case of bad weather and for the odd ski ascent), 4 or more (to ski/climb whatever all the peaks your heart may desire). I've been told its been done in 4 hours. Gasp.
April 25, 2011, at 11:53 PM by 24.64.76.54 -
Changed line 20 from:
* there are several small variations, where you can avoid some elevation loss by traversing steeper slopes. Take care on these. Some can be quite exposed, especially if the avalanche conditions are not great or the sun is shining. If lighting is bad and you are following other people's tracks, you may get sucked onto a variation without realizing it. I think that the 1-day skiers mostly take these, because they are not burdened by heavy packs. But having said that, we did them all but one: we turned back from under Mt. Fitsimmons because we didn't like the snow conditions on it.
to:
* There are several small variations, where you can avoid some elevation loss by traversing steeper slopes. Take care on these. Some can be quite exposed, especially if the avalanche conditions are not great or the sun is shining. If lighting is bad and you are following other people's tracks, you may get sucked onto a variation without realizing it. I think that the 1-day skiers mostly take these, because they are not burdened by heavy packs. But having said that, we did them all but one: we turned back from under Mt. Fitsimmons because we didn't like the snow conditions on it.
April 25, 2011, at 11:53 PM by 24.64.76.54 -
Changed lines 13-14 from:
Many people do this in a single day, and this is very achievable by a fit skier. But I must admit that I would only do that if the weather and snow looked perfect (or if I was very very familiar with the route). For example, we started off on a great day, but by 2pm we couldn't see 10 feet in front of us. So we camped. Even if you have a GPS, you probably want to avoid travelling in a severe whiteout. Indeed, the whole point of this trip is the spectacular views.
to:
Many people do this in a single day, and this is very achievable by a fit skier. But I must admit that I would only do that if the weather and snow looked perfect (or if I was very very familiar with the route). For example, we (my son Adam and I) started off on a great day, but by 2pm we couldn't see 10 feet in front of us. So we camped. Even if you have a GPS, you probably want to avoid travelling in a severe whiteout because there are a few cliffs, wind rolls, etc. But even more important, a major point of this trip is the spectacular views.
Changed lines 19-20 from:
The only cautionary notes are:
* there are several small
variations, where you can avoid some elevation loss by traversing steeper slopes. Take care on these - some can be quite exposed, especially if the avalanche conditions are not great or the sun is shining. If lighting is bad and you are following other people's tracks, you may get sucked onto a variation without realizing it. I think that the 1-day skiers mostly take these, because they are not burdened by heavy packs. But having said that, we did them all but 1 (the one under Mt. Fitsimmons, where we turned back near the end because we didn't like the snow conditions on it).
to:
'''Cautionary notes.'''
* there
are several small variations, where you can avoid some elevation loss by traversing steeper slopes. Take care on these. Some can be quite exposed, especially if the avalanche conditions are not great or the sun is shining. If lighting is bad and you are following other people's tracks, you may get sucked onto a variation without realizing it. I think that the 1-day skiers mostly take these, because they are not burdened by heavy packs. But having said that, we did them all but one: we turned back from under Mt. Fitsimmons because we didn't like the snow conditions on it.
Changed line 22 from:
* Glaciers. They felt good. But there are big holes under there. Ropes, harnesses, etc... its up to you.
to:
* Glaciers. They are pretty awesome. But there are big holes under all that snow. Ropes, harnesses, etc... but its up to you.
April 25, 2011, at 11:43 PM by 24.64.76.54 -
Changed lines 17-22 from:
'''Fact'''. I'm not going to tell you the way. The enclosed maps and GPS data (which includes waypoints and the route track) should be considered a supplement to the commercial map titled 'Backcountry Whistler' (aka John Baldwin's map) which shows not only the primary route, but variations and ski ascents. Baldwin's book also has route description. But I was surprised how hard it was to find a detailed GPS route, which is why I include mine here. My maps are also very small scale, so you will also see small terrain features that are a bit harder to spot on Baldwin's map. Take both.
to:
'''Fact'''. I'm not going to tell you the way. The enclosed maps and GPS data (which include waypoints and the route track) should be considered a supplement to the commercial map titled 'Backcountry Whistler' (aka John Baldwin's map) which shows not only the primary route, but variations and ski ascents. Baldwin's book also has route description. But I was surprised how hard it was to find a detailed GPS route, which is why I include mine here. My maps are also very small scale, so you will also see small terrain features that are a bit harder to spot on Baldwin's map. Take both.

The only cautionary notes are:
* there are several small variations, where you can avoid some elevation loss by traversing steeper slopes. Take care on these - some can be quite exposed, especially if the avalanche conditions are not great or the sun is shining. If lighting is bad and you are following other people's tracks, you may get sucked onto a variation without realizing it. I think that the 1-day skiers mostly take these, because they are not burdened by heavy packs. But having said that, we did them all but 1 (the one under Mt. Fitsimmons, where we turned back near the end because we didn't like the snow conditions on it).
* Even though much of the route travels on low-angle glaciers, it sometimes traverses under steep slopes above. Again, watch for avalanche conditions.
* Glaciers. They felt good. But there are big holes under there. Ropes, harnesses, etc... its up to you
.
April 25, 2011, at 11:38 PM by 24.64.76.54 -
Changed line 1 from:
(:title Spearhead Traverse - Whistler, BC.:)
to:
(:title Spearhead Traverse - Whistler, BC. (GPS and Maps) :)
April 25, 2011, at 11:37 PM by 24.64.76.54 -
Changed lines 11-15 from:
'''Opinion'''. This route has been on my list for years. While its probably one of the most often done ski traverses in Canada, it is truly spectacular. What blew me away about it was how this route goes through big mountain country, yet it manages to thread its way through these spectacular peaks via high relatively gentle glaciers in between a myriad of cols. In late spring (when I did it) the glaciers were so well covered that crevasses on the route were almost invisible. Many people do this in a single day, but I must admit that I would only do that if the weather looked perfect (or if I was very very familiar with the route). For example, we started off on a great day, but by 2pm we couldn't see 10 feet in front of us. So we camped. Even if you have a GPS, you probably want to avoid travelling in a severe whiteout - indeed, the whole point of this trip is the spectacular views. If you do the trip without any ski ascents, you'll find the skiing somewhat ho-hum, as most of the time you are sidehilling slopes. There aren't really that many great descents. But, if you have the time, you can do an incredible amount of skiing on the slopes that you pass by, as well as ascend myriads of peaks. All depends on you. If you just want to get through, its a great tour. If you want to take the time and camp out several days, you can do tons of skiing.
to:
'''Opinion'''. This route has been on my list for years. While its probably one of the most often done ski traverses in Canada, it is truly spectacular. What blew me away about it was how this route goes through big mountain country, yet it manages to thread its way through these spectacular peaks via relatively gentle glaciers in between a myriad of high cols. In late spring (when I did it) the glaciers were so well covered that crevasses on the route were almost invisible.

Many people do this in a single day, and this is very achievable by a fit skier. But I must admit that I would only do that if the weather and snow looked perfect (or if I was very very familiar with the route). For example, we started off on a great day, but by 2pm we couldn't see 10 feet in front of us. So we camped. Even if you have a GPS, you probably want to avoid travelling in a severe whiteout. Indeed, the whole point of this trip is the spectacular views.

And what about the
skiing? If you do the trip strictly as a tour without any ski ascents, you'll find the skiing somewhat ho-hum, as most of the time you are sidehilling up and down glaciers. There aren't really that many great descents. But (and this is a big but) if you have the time, you can do an incredible amount of skiing on the slopes that you pass by. You can also ascend myriads of peaks along the way - most are a short distance from your high points. So the amount of ski yeehaws depends on you. If you just want to get through the traverse, its a great tour. If you want to take the time and camp out several days, you can do tons of incredible skiing.
Changed lines 17-18 from:
'''Fact'''. I'm not going to tell you the way. The enclosed GPS data and maps should be considered a supplement to the commercial map titled 'Backcountry Whistler' (aka John Baldwin's map) which shows not only the primary route, but variations and ski ascents. Baldwin's book also has route description. But I was surprised how hard it was to find a detailed GPS route, which is why I include mine here. My maps are also very small scale, so you can see small terrain features.
to:
'''Fact'''. I'm not going to tell you the way. The enclosed maps and GPS data (which includes waypoints and the route track) should be considered a supplement to the commercial map titled 'Backcountry Whistler' (aka John Baldwin's map) which shows not only the primary route, but variations and ski ascents. Baldwin's book also has route description. But I was surprised how hard it was to find a detailed GPS route, which is why I include mine here. My maps are also very small scale, so you will also see small terrain features that are a bit harder to spot on Baldwin's map. Take both.
April 25, 2011, at 11:32 PM by 24.64.76.54 -
Changed lines 9-10 from:
* Trailhead: Blackcomb.
to:
* Trailhead: Blackcomb ski area, taking lifts to the top.
April 25, 2011, at 11:32 PM by 24.64.76.54 -
Changed line 8 from:
* Elevation gain: See the profile included on the map. What makes this superb is that you gain a huge amount of elevation by taking lifts to the top of Blackcomb. While there is still lots of up and down (~2000m overall), most of the elevation gains are modest (i.e., several hundred meters)
to:
* Elevation gain: See the profile included on the map. What makes this superb is that you gain a huge amount of elevation by taking lifts to the top of Blackcomb. While there is still lots of up and down (~2000m overall), most of the elevation gains are modest (i.e., a few hundred meters between cols and gaps)
April 25, 2011, at 11:31 PM by 24.64.76.54 -
Changed line 3 from:
%rfloat% Maps:SpearheadTraverse.jpg \\
to:
%rfloat% Maps:SpearheadTraverse.JPG \\
April 25, 2011, at 11:29 PM by 24.64.76.54 -
Added lines 1-14:
(:title Spearhead Traverse - Whistler, BC.:)
'''-[[Personal/TripsAndMaps|Return to Saul Greenberg's Trips and Maps]]-'''
%rfloat% Maps:SpearheadTraverse.jpg \\
photo: Saul Greenberg
* [[Maps:SpearheadTraverse.pdf|Maps]] and [[Maps:SpearheadTraverse.gdb|GPS data]].
* Ski Traverse appropriate for competent ski mountaineers
* ~41 kms total (according to my GPS), exiting via Singing Pass.
* Elevation gain: See the profile included on the map. What makes this superb is that you gain a huge amount of elevation by taking lifts to the top of Blackcomb. While there is still lots of up and down (~2000m overall), most of the elevation gains are modest (i.e., several hundred meters)
* Trailhead: Blackcomb.

'''Opinion'''. This route has been on my list for years. While its probably one of the most often done ski traverses in Canada, it is truly spectacular. What blew me away about it was how this route goes through big mountain country, yet it manages to thread its way through these spectacular peaks via high relatively gentle glaciers in between a myriad of cols. In late spring (when I did it) the glaciers were so well covered that crevasses on the route were almost invisible. Many people do this in a single day, but I must admit that I would only do that if the weather looked perfect (or if I was very very familiar with the route). For example, we started off on a great day, but by 2pm we couldn't see 10 feet in front of us. So we camped. Even if you have a GPS, you probably want to avoid travelling in a severe whiteout - indeed, the whole point of this trip is the spectacular views. If you do the trip without any ski ascents, you'll find the skiing somewhat ho-hum, as most of the time you are sidehilling slopes. There aren't really that many great descents. But, if you have the time, you can do an incredible amount of skiing on the slopes that you pass by, as well as ascend myriads of peaks. All depends on you. If you just want to get through, its a great tour. If you want to take the time and camp out several days, you can do tons of skiing.


'''Fact'''. I'm not going to tell you the way. The enclosed GPS data and maps should be considered a supplement to the commercial map titled 'Backcountry Whistler' (aka John Baldwin's map) which shows not only the primary route, but variations and ski ascents. Baldwin's book also has route description. But I was surprised how hard it was to find a detailed GPS route, which is why I include mine here. My maps are also very small scale, so you can see small terrain features.