| Student Names | _____________________ | _____________________ | _____________________ | Group #_______ |
| Put student ID's on back | ||||
| . | |||
| Completeness of Report | Missing | Incomplete portions | Satisfactory |
| scenario | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| methodology | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| observations | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| interpretations | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| suggested improvements | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| conclusions | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Appendix 1: Comparison | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Appendix 2: Raw data | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| . | |||
| . | |||
| Graphics of work | Poor | Okay | Looks Great. |
| packaging (cover, etc) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| typography | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| illustrations, if any | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| use of white space | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| overall appearance | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| length | 0 (too short or long) | 0 | 0 |
| . | |||
| . | |||
| Literary Quality | Poor | Ok, but proof read | Great |
| spelling/typos | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| grammar | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| paragraph structure | 0 (sloppy) | 0 | 0 |
| section structure | 0 (poor flow) | 0 | 0 (natural flow) |
| clarity of writing | 0 (hard to read) | 0 | 0 (easy to read) |
| style and interest | 0 (boring) | 0 | 0 (interesting) |
| verboseness | 0 (far too wordy) | 0 | 0 (every word counts) |
| . | |||
| . | |||
| Technical Quality | Poor | Okay | Great |
| scenario | 0 (poor background) | 0 | 0 (explained system, your role, &
point of report) |
| methodology | 0 (didn't summarize) | 0 | 0 (concise description of methods used) |
| observations | 0 (hard to understand) | 0 | 0 (good summary of observations) |
| interpretations | 0 (little insight added) | 0 | 0 (strength/weaknesses
identified/generalized) |
| suggested improvements | 0 (poor/minor) | 0 | 0 (excellent low-cost design changes) |
| conclusions and recommendations | 0 (didn't conclude) | 0 | 0 (summarized results and
recommendations) |
| . | |||
| . | |||
| . | |||
| Appendix 1 | 0 (little insight added) | 0 | 0 (excellent discussion of methods) |
| Appendix 2 | 0 (poorly organized) | 0 | 0 (shows good record-keeping) |
| Sample tasks | 0 (no/poor tasks) | 0 | 0 (excellent sample tasks) |
| Questionnaire | 0 (irrelevant questions) | 0 | 0 (highly relevant questions) |
| Thoroughness of treatment | 0 (superficial) | 0 | 0 (balanced depth & breadth) |
| . | |||
| . | |||
| . |
Grade: A+ ...... A ....... A- ....... B+ ....... B .......
B- ....... C+ ....... C ....... C- ....... D+ ....... D ....... D- .......
F+ ....... F ....... F-
Note : A is superior report; B is better than expected;
C is adequate; D is poor; F is unacceptable
Turn over for evaluator's comments and/or see report.
Students are invited to see the T.A. for further comments on their report.