Student Names | _____________________ | _____________________ | _____________________ | Group #_______ |
Note: These are just "convenience" checkpoints. Getting many satisfactory checks does not necessarily indicate a good project (or vice versa). |
Completeness of Project | Missing | Incomplete
portions |
Satisfactory |
1st deliverable (screens+design rationale) | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
working demo | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
heuristic evaluation | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
redesign rationale+final design critique | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
Screen snaps/design rationale | Poor | Ok | Great |
practical realization of storyboards | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
fixes major flaws in storyboards | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
shows progress of design | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
good rationale behind design | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
Sophistication and quality of design | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
Final Design Critique | Poor | Okay | Great |
indicates major problems | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
indicates major problems | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
demonstrates design evolution | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
|
|||
Please
|
turn over... |
Student IDs | _____________________ | _____________________ | _____________________ |
Implementation |
|||
Completion | Poor | Okay | Great |
depth of interface shown | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
breadth of interface shown | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
non-interface aspects | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
scope of project | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
sophistication and quality | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
Graphical design | Poor | Okay | Great |
visual appearance | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
sensibility of layouts | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
sophistication and quality | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
Usability | Poor | Okay | Great |
simple and natural dialog | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
speaks the users language | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
minimizes memory load | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
consistent | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
provides feedback | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
clearly marked exits | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
shortcuts for experts | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
user error handling | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
provides relevant help | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
use of windows/dialog structures | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
Technical aspects | Poor | Okay | Great |
robust/bulletproof | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
sophistication | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
code | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
Please
|
turn over... |
Student IDs | _____________________ | _____________________ | _____________________ |
Demonstration | Poor | Okay | Great |
group present | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
group members all understand project | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
gave a good feel of system | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
Overall impression | Poor | Okay | Great |
of final design | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
of design evolution | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
of portfolio | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
of heuristic evaluation | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
of demonstration | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
of implementation | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
of complete project | |_____________________ | |_____________________ | | |
Grade: A+ ...... A ....... A- ....... B+ ....... B ....... B- ....... C+ ....... C ....... C- ....... D+ ....... D ....... D- ....... F
Note : A is superior; B is better than expected; C is adequate; D
is poor; F is unacceptable
Students are invited to see the T.A. for further comments on their
report.